Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Wizardlm 13b
Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Wizardlm 13b leads 27.8 to 9.6.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Wizardlm 13b leads
Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322), Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1035 |
Reasoning Claude 2.1 leads
Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216), Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1018 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Wizardlm 13b leads
Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309), Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1023 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1049 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Wizardlm 13b?
Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Wizardlm 13b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.6 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Wizardlm 13b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.