Noometry

Model comparison

DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek LLM 67B DeepSeek

24.9

Rank #347 Confirmed

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct Alibaba (Qwen)

38.1

Rank #190 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 37.0 to 7.0.

Side by side

DeepSeek LLM 67BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index24.938.1
Released2023-11-292025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked1525

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223)

BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Coding10961412
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
LMArena WebDev—1275
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—41.2%
ALE-Bench—461.45
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek LLM 67B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123)

BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%

Reasoning Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149)

BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10701372
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%
Chess Puzzles0%—
Epoch Capabilities Index110.5—

Math Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150)

BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Math11081365
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.8%—
MATH Level 56.4%—

Knowledge Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162)

BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
GPQA Diamond24.6%—
LMArena Expert—1338

Multilingual Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148)

BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English10731346
LMArena Chinese11321357
LMArena French—1398
LMArena German—1325
LMArena Japanese—1310
LMArena Korean—1305
LMArena Russian—1366
LMArena Spanish—1360

Instruction Following Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147)

BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10791355

Long Context Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131)

BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query10921378

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147)

BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text11051357
LMArena Creative Writing10671333
LMArena Multi-Turn10821365

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.5 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper