Model comparison

Claude 2 vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2 Anthropic

24.7

Rank #342 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 34.9 to 8.7.
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 2 and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
Claude 2Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index24.737.7
Released2023-07-112025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked825

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.2 (#199)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
LMArena WebDev—1275
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—41.2%
LMArena Coding—1413
ALE-Bench—461.45
AlgoTune—1.44
HumanEval+61.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.7 (#116)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%

Reasoning Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Claude 2: 20.8 (#213), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 24.7 (#141)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1372
DTBench51.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index120.08—

Math Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Claude 2: 8.7 (#314), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 34.9 (#151)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%—
LMArena Math—1364
MATH Level 511.7%—

Knowledge Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Claude 2: 17.0 (#282), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.4 (#159)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
GPQA Diamond34.7%—
LMArena Expert—1337
MMLU78.5%—
TriviaQA87.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.8 (#143)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1345
LMArena Chinese—1356
LMArena French—1394
LMArena German—1324
LMArena Japanese—1309
LMArena Korean—1307
LMArena Russian—1367
LMArena Spanish—1360

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.8 (#142)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following—1356

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#126)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1379

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.5 (#142)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text—1356
LMArena Creative Writing—1333
LMArena Multi-Turn—1365

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2 better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper