Model comparison

DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Mistral Small 3

Mistral Small 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek LLM 67B DeepSeek

24.9

Rank #347 Confirmed

Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI

31.2

Rank #278 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Mistral Small 3 in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Mistral Small 3 leads 25.1 to 7.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 24.6% for DeepSeek LLM 67B and 47.3% for Mistral Small 3.

Side by side

DeepSeek LLM 67B and Mistral Small 3 specifications
DeepSeek LLM 67BMistral Small 3
ProviderDeepSeekMistral AI
Noometry Index24.931.2
Released2023-11-292025-01-30
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—33K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.08
Results tracked1524

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Small 3 leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), Mistral Small 3: 36.5 (#207)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BMistral Small 3
LMArena Coding10961246
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.3%
BigCodeBench Complete—50.4%

Reasoning Mistral Small 3 leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), Mistral Small 3: 18.9 (#273)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BMistral Small 3
Chess Puzzles0%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts10701233
Epoch Capabilities Index110.5127.07

Math Mistral Small 3 leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), Mistral Small 3: 16.3 (#295)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BMistral Small 3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.8%6.7%
LMArena Math11081240
MATH Level 56.4%—

Knowledge Mistral Small 3 leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), Mistral Small 3: 25.1 (#263)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BMistral Small 3
GPQA Diamond24.6%47.3%
Confabulations—25.2%
LMArena Expert—1202

Multilingual Mistral Small 3 leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), Mistral Small 3: 37.3 (#236)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BMistral Small 3
LMArena Non-English10731198
LMArena Chinese11321204
LMArena French—1203
LMArena German—1211
LMArena Japanese—1111
LMArena Korean—1188
LMArena Russian—1216

Instruction Following Mistral Small 3 leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), Mistral Small 3: 63.7 (#229)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BMistral Small 3
LMArena Instruction Following10791214

Long Context Mistral Small 3 leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#211)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BMistral Small 3
LMArena Longer Query10921246

Writing & Preference Too close to call

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), Mistral Small 3: 32.2 (#280)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BMistral Small 3
LMArena Text11051234
LMArena Creative Writing10671195
LMArena Multi-Turn10821217
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—707

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Mistral Small 3?

Mistral Small 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Mistral Small 3 better for coding?

Mistral Small 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.5 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Mistral Small 3 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3 has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper