Model comparison

Claude 2.1 vs Mistral Small 3

Mistral Small 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2.1 Anthropic

25.2

Rank #345 Reported

Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI

31.2

Rank #278 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Small 3 in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Mistral Small 3 leads 36.5 to 26.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 33% for Claude 2.1 and 47.3% for Mistral Small 3.
  • Mistral Small 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 2.1 and Mistral Small 3 specifications
Claude 2.1Mistral Small 3
ProviderAnthropicMistral AI
Noometry Index25.231.2
Released2023-11-212025-01-30
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—33K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.08
Results tracked724

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Small 3 leads

Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), Mistral Small 3: 36.5 (#207)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Mistral Small 3
WeirdML7.1%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.3%
LMArena Coding—1246
BigCodeBench Complete—50.4%

Reasoning Claude 2.1 leads

Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), Mistral Small 3: 18.9 (#273)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Mistral Small 3
Epoch Capabilities Index119.27127.07
Chess Puzzles—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1233
DTBench51%—
ForecastBench54.2—

Math Mistral Small 3 leads

Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), Mistral Small 3: 16.3 (#295)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Mistral Small 3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%6.7%
LMArena Math—1240

Knowledge Mistral Small 3 leads

Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), Mistral Small 3: 25.1 (#263)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Mistral Small 3
GPQA Diamond33%47.3%
Confabulations—25.2%
LMArena Expert—1202
MMLU73.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Mistral Small 3: 37.3 (#236)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Mistral Small 3
LMArena Non-English—1198
LMArena Chinese—1204
LMArena French—1203
LMArena German—1211
LMArena Japanese—1111
LMArena Korean—1188
LMArena Russian—1216

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Mistral Small 3: 63.7 (#229)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Mistral Small 3
LMArena Instruction Following—1214

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#211)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Mistral Small 3
LMArena Longer Query—1246

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Mistral Small 3: 32.2 (#280)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Mistral Small 3
LMArena Text—1234
LMArena Creative Writing—1195
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—707
LMArena Multi-Turn—1217

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2.1 better than Mistral Small 3?

Mistral Small 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 2.1 or Mistral Small 3 better for coding?

Mistral Small 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.5 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Mistral Small 3 share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3 has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper