Model comparison

DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek LLM 67B DeepSeek

24.9

Rank #347 Confirmed

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 xAI

37.7

Rank #198 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads 33.9 to 7.0.
  • DeepSeek LLM 67B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek LLM 67B and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 specifications
DeepSeek LLM 67BGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
ProviderDeepSeekxAI
Noometry Index24.937.7
Released2023-11-292024-08-13
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1517

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 37.0 (#199)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
LMArena Coding10961269

Reasoning Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 24.8 (#159)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
LMArena Hard Prompts10701255
Chess Puzzles0%—
Epoch Capabilities Index110.5—

Math Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 35.4 (#185)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
LMArena Math11081265
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.8%—
MATH Level 56.4%—

Knowledge Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.9 (#200)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
GPQA Diamond24.6%—
LMArena Expert—1238

Multilingual Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.4 (#208)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
LMArena Non-English10731257
LMArena Chinese11321262
LMArena French—1286
LMArena German—1273
LMArena Japanese—1213
LMArena Korean—1195
LMArena Russian—1261
LMArena Spanish—1279

Instruction Following Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.5 (#220)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
LMArena Instruction Following10791245

Long Context Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#196)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
LMArena Longer Query10921266

Writing & Preference Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.3 (#211)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
LMArena Text11051281
LMArena Creative Writing10671242
LMArena Multi-Turn10821265

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13?

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better for coding?

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper