Model comparison

DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Granite 3.0 2b Instruct

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek LLM 67B DeepSeek

24.8

Rank #341 Confirmed

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct IBM

30.2

Rank #284 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 5 categories and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads 29.7 to 8.1.

Side by side

DeepSeek LLM 67B and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct specifications
DeepSeek LLM 67BGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
ProviderDeepSeekIBM
Noometry Index24.830.2
Released2023-11-29—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1513

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.3 (#273), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.8 (#311)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Coding10961090
BigCodeBench Instruct—20.5%

Reasoning Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 15.9 (#300), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 19.6 (#234)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10701073
Chess Puzzles0%—
Epoch Capabilities Index110.54—

Math Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.1 (#318), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.7 (#215)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Math11081117
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.8%—
MATH Level 56.4%—

Knowledge Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.1 (#308), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.4 (#238)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
GPQA Diamond24.6%—
LMArena Expert—1064

Multilingual DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.5 (#262), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.1 (#273)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Non-English10731033
LMArena Chinese11321070
LMArena Russian—1045

Instruction Following DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.7 (#272), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 54.2 (#279)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10791056

Long Context Too close to call

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#260), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#263)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query10921071

Writing & Preference DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.8 (#277), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.8 (#287)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Text11051080
LMArena Creative Writing10671046
LMArena Multi-Turn10821053

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Granite 3.0 2b Instruct?

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better for coding?

DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.3 versus 27.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper