Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs DeepSeek LLM 67B

Codellama 34b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.8

Rank #287 Confirmed

DeepSeek LLM 67B DeepSeek

24.9

Rank #347 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and DeepSeek LLM 67B in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Codellama 34b Instruct leads 31.0 to 8.7.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and DeepSeek LLM 67B specifications
Codellama 34b InstructDeepSeek LLM 67B
ProviderMetaDeepSeek
Noometry Index30.824.9
Released—2023-11-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1415

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructDeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Coding10461096
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Reasoning Codellama 34b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructDeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Hard Prompts10321070
Chess Puzzles—0%
Epoch Capabilities Index—110.5

Math Codellama 34b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructDeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Math10561108
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—0.8%
MATH Level 5—6.4%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructDeepSeek LLM 67B
GPQA Diamond—24.6%

Multilingual DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructDeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Non-English10111073
LMArena Chinese9761132

Instruction Following DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructDeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Instruction Following10281079

Long Context DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructDeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Longer Query10131092

Writing & Preference DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructDeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Text10661105
LMArena Creative Writing10321067
LMArena Multi-Turn10151082

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than DeepSeek LLM 67B?

Codellama 34b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or DeepSeek LLM 67B better for coding?

DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.9 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and DeepSeek LLM 67B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper