Model comparison
DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Seed 2.0 Pro
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
ByteDance SeedSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Seed 2.0 Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 40.2 to 7.0.
- DeepSeek LLM 67B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek LLM 67B | Seed 2.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | ByteDance Seed |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 43.2 |
| Released | 2023-11-29 | 2026-02-14 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $3 |
| Results tracked | 15 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | 1472 |
Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | 1453 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 28.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 57.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.5 | — |
Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1108 | 1439 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |
Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1440 |
Multimodal Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: —, Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1274 |
Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | 1441 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1489 |
| LMArena French | — | 1471 |
| LMArena German | — | 1442 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1408 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1449 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1460 |
Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | 1414 |
Long Context Seed 2.0 Pro leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | 1428 |
Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | 1448 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | 1406 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | 1441 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Seed 2.0 Pro?
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Seed 2.0 Pro better for coding?
Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Seed 2.0 Pro share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Seed 2.0 Pro has 20.