Model comparison
Claude 2 vs Seed 2.0 Pro
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
ByteDance SeedSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 39.3 to 9.3.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | Seed 2.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | ByteDance Seed |
| Noometry Index | 25.0 | 43.2 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | 2026-02-14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $3 |
| Results tracked | 8 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1472 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 28.4% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 57.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1453 |
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.13 | — |
Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1439 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1440 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1274 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1441 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1489 |
| LMArena French | — | 1471 |
| LMArena German | — | 1442 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1408 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1449 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1460 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1414 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1428 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1448 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1406 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1441 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than Seed 2.0 Pro?
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Seed 2.0 Pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Seed 2.0 Pro has 20.