Model comparison
Deepseek Coder v2 vs Wizardlm 13b
Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Deepseek Coder v2 leads 36.4 to 27.3.
Side by side
| Deepseek Coder v2 | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 35.3 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2024-06-17 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 37.5 (#178), Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1251 | 1035 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.7% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 82.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 75.1% | — |
Reasoning Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 22.6 (#175), Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1207 | 1018 |
| WinoGrande | 83.7% | — |
Math Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#188), Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1241 | 1017 |
| GSM8K | 94.5% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Deepseek Coder v2: 31.7 (#209), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1181 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 64.3% | — |
Multilingual Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 36.4 (#235), Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1182 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1201 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1184 | — |
| LMArena German | 1164 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1126 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1104 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1188 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1153 | — |
Instruction Following Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 61.9 (#237), Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1180 | 1049 |
Long Context Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#219), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 38.4 (#249), Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1120 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1176 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than Wizardlm 13b?
Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Deepseek Coder v2 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.5 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.