Model comparison

Deepseek Coder v2 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B

Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Deepseek Coder v2 DeepSeek

35.9

Rank #220 Confirmed

Qwen3-30B-A3B Alibaba (Qwen)

38.9

Rank #179 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3-30B-A3B in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-30B-A3B leads 55.6 to 38.2.

Side by side

Deepseek Coder v2 and Qwen3-30B-A3B specifications
Deepseek Coder v2Qwen3-30B-A3B
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index35.938.9
Released2024-06-172025-04-28
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—41K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.12
Output $ / M tokens—$0.50
Results tracked2432

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.5 (#194)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Coding12511416
SciCode—33.3%
WeirdML—29.8%
BigCodeBench Instruct48.2%—
BigCodeBench Complete59.7%—
HumanEval+82.3%—
MBPP+75.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Deepseek Coder v2: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 29.8 (#82)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3-30B-A3B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—41.4%

Reasoning Deepseek Coder v2 leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 22.2 (#204)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Hard Prompts12071398
Kagi LLM Benchmark—54.9%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—8%
DTBench—69.3%
LMCA—22.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—139.63
WinoGrande83.7%—

Math Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.4 (#157)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Math12411394
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—47.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—70.3%
GSM8K94.5%—

Knowledge Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 41.8 (#105)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Expert11811396
GPQA Diamond—70.1%
Confabulations—12.3%
ARC (AI2) Challenge64.3%—

Multilingual Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 49.5 (#132)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Non-English11821372
LMArena Chinese12011433
LMArena French11851418
LMArena German11641380
LMArena Japanese11261337
LMArena Korean11041331
LMArena Russian11881370
LMArena Spanish11531404

Instruction Following Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 72.0 (#142)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Instruction Following11801363

Long Context Deepseek Coder v2 leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 31.0 (#283)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Longer Query12191379
Fiction.LiveBench—40.6%

Writing & Preference Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 55.6 (#143)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Text11911384
LMArena Creative Writing11201317
LMArena Multi-Turn11771378
Short-Story Creative Writing—75.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than Qwen3-30B-A3B?

Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Deepseek Coder v2 or Qwen3-30B-A3B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (38.1 vs 37.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and Qwen3-30B-A3B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-30B-A3B has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper