Model comparison
Deepseek Coder v2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeekSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 66.8 to 38.2.
Side by side
| Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 50.3 |
| Released | 2024-06-17 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1251 | 1534 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1629 |
| SciCode | — | 60.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.7% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |
| HumanEval+ | 82.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 75.1% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Deepseek Coder v2: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1207 | 1512 |
| CritPt | — | 26.6% |
| WinoGrande | 83.7% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1241 | 1494 |
| ProofBench | — | 70% |
| GSM8K | 94.5% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1181 | 1543 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 64.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Deepseek Coder v2: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1182 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1201 | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | 1188 | 1480 |
| LMArena French | 1185 | — |
| LMArena German | 1164 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1126 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1104 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1153 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1180 | 1493 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1501 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1120 | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1177 | 1464 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Deepseek Coder v2 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 38.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.