Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B vs MiMo-V2-Flash
MiMo-V2-Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#137); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeekSide by side
| DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 37.1 | 40.8 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: 35.2 (#216), MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1443 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 43.8% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
| HumanEval+ | 71.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 65.6% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.1 (#155)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1420 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 88.88 | — |
| WinoGrande | 57.6% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.6 (#141)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1396 |
| GSM8K | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.1 (#126)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1425 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 36.4% | — |
| MMLU | 36.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.1 (#109)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1391 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1463 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1324 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1392 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#106)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1409 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.9 (#101)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1404 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#137); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (35.2 vs 35.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 6.7B and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.