Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has enough public results to be ranked (#139); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 40.0 to 35.8.
- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: 35.8 (#219), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1361 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 43.8% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 71.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 65.6% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1374 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.62 | — |
| WinoGrande | 57.6% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1359 |
| GSM8K | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1339 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 36.4% | — |
| MMLU | 36.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1363 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1417 |
| LMArena French | — | 1391 |
| LMArena German | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1342 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1368 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1344 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1366 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1359 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1387 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has enough public results to be ranked (#139); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 6.7B and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.