Model comparison

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has enough public results to be ranked (#139); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B DeepSeek

37.6

Unranked Sparse

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 40.0 to 35.8.
  • DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 specifications
DeepSeek Coder 6.7BHunyuan Turbos 20250226
ProviderDeepSeekTencent
Noometry Index37.641.3
Released2023-11-02—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked916

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: 35.8 (#219), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 6.7BHunyuan Turbos 20250226
BigCodeBench Instruct35.5%—
LMArena Coding—1361
BigCodeBench Complete43.8%—
HumanEval+71.3%—
MBPP+65.6%—

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 6.7BHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Hard Prompts—1374
Epoch Capabilities Index89.62—
WinoGrande57.6%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 6.7BHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Math—1359
GSM8K21.3%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 6.7BHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Expert—1339
ARC (AI2) Challenge36.4%—
MMLU36.4%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 6.7BHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Non-English—1363
LMArena Chinese—1417
LMArena French—1391
LMArena German—1355
LMArena Japanese—1342
LMArena Korean—1351
LMArena Russian—1368

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 6.7BHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Instruction Following—1344

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 6.7BHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Longer Query—1366

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 6.7BHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Text—1377
LMArena Creative Writing—1359
LMArena Multi-Turn—1387

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has enough public results to be ranked (#139); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 6.7B and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper