Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B vs Mercury 2.5
Neither DeepSeek Coder 6.7B nor Mercury 2.5 has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeekSummary
- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Mercury 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Inception |
| Noometry Index | 37.1 | 30.2 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | 2026-09-08 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 260K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.04 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 2 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: 35.2 (#216), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 43.8% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 301.65 |
| HumanEval+ | 71.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 65.6% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 88.88 | — |
| WinoGrande | 57.6% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Mercury 2.5: 22.4
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
| GSM8K | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 36.4% | — |
| MMLU | 36.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B better than Mercury 2.5?
Neither DeepSeek Coder 6.7B nor Mercury 2.5 has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 6.7B and Mercury 2.5 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2.5 has 2.