Model comparison

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B vs Grok 4.1 Fast

Grok 4.1 Fast has enough public results to be ranked (#131); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B DeepSeek

37.1

Unranked Sparse

Grok 4.1 Fast xAI

40.9

Rank #131 Confirmed

Summary

  • DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B and Grok 4.1 Fast specifications
DeepSeek Coder 6.7BGrok 4.1 Fast
ProviderDeepSeekxAI
Noometry Index37.140.9
Released2023-11-022025-06-27
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—128K
Max output—30K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.20
Output $ / M tokens—$0.50
Results tracked932

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek Coder 6.7B leads

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: 35.2 (#216), Grok 4.1 Fast: 33.8 (#236)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 6.7BGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena WebDev—1241
BigCodeBench Instruct35.5%—
LMArena Coding—1411
BigCodeBench Complete43.8%—
ALE-Bench—394.93
HumanEval+71.3%—
MBPP+65.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.1 (#35)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 6.7BGrok 4.1 Fast
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—69.6%
τ²-bench Banking—13.1%
LMArena Search—1171
Vending-Bench 2—1,107

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.3 (#45)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 6.7BGrok 4.1 Fast
SimpleBench—56%
NYT Connections (extended)—87.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1407
DTBench—87.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index88.88—
ForecastBench—61
WinoGrande57.6%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 30.9 (#201)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 6.7BGrok 4.1 Fast
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—60.9%
ProofBench—4%
LMArena Math—1408
GSM8K21.3%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 32.6 (#203)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 6.7BGrok 4.1 Fast
Vectara Hallucination Rate—17.8%
LMArena Expert—1398
ARC (AI2) Challenge36.4%—
MMLU36.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.3 (#71)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 6.7BGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Vision—1201

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 51.1 (#110)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 6.7BGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Non-English—1391
LMArena Chinese—1441
LMArena French—1416
LMArena German—1404
LMArena Japanese—1347
LMArena Korean—1361
LMArena Russian—1387
LMArena Spanish—1411

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 72.8 (#127)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 6.7BGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Instruction Following—1376

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.4 (#121)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 6.7BGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Longer Query—1390

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 57.4 (#126)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 6.7BGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Text—1408
LMArena Creative Writing—1394
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1327
LMArena Multi-Turn—1389

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B better than Grok 4.1 Fast?

Grok 4.1 Fast has enough public results to be ranked (#131); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B or Grok 4.1 Fast better for coding?

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 6.7B and Grok 4.1 Fast share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 Fast has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper