Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B vs ERNIE 5.0 0110
ERNIE 5.0 0110 has enough public results to be ranked (#129); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
BaiduSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 42.3 to 35.2.
- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Baidu |
| Noometry Index | 37.1 | 41.2 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: 35.2 (#216), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1455 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 43.8% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 71.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 65.6% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 10.3% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1446 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 88.88 | — |
| WinoGrande | 57.6% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1437 |
| GSM8K | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1427 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 36.4% | — |
| MMLU | 36.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1248 |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1436 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1512 |
| LMArena French | — | 1466 |
| LMArena German | — | 1462 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1383 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1446 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1473 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1413 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1422 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1445 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1426 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1433 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B better than ERNIE 5.0 0110?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 has enough public results to be ranked (#129); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B or ERNIE 5.0 0110 better for coding?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 6.7B and ERNIE 5.0 0110 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has 9 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20.