Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B vs Gemma 3 12B
Gemma 3 12B has enough public results to be ranked (#255); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
GoogleSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B scores higher in 1 category and Gemma 3 12B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek Coder 6.7B leads 35.2 to 31.2.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 3 12B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | |
| Noometry Index | 37.1 | 31.8 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | 2025-03-12 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek Coder 6.7B leads
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: 35.2 (#216), Gemma 3 12B: 31.2 (#276)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 17.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1281 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 43.8% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 71.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 65.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemma 3 12B: 25.3 (#101)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 30.4% |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemma 3 12B: 15.2 (#307)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 88.88 | 123.49 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1309 |
| DTBench | — | 48.8% |
| LMCA | — | 4.5% |
| WinoGrande | 57.6% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemma 3 12B: 21.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.7% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1307 |
| GSM8K | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#250)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 39.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.4% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1248 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 36.4% | — |
| MMLU | 36.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemma 3 12B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| MindCube | — | 46.7% |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemma 3 12B: 45.9 (#160)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1318 |
| LMArena German | — | 1370 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1335 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemma 3 12B: 68.8 (#179)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1299 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#157)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1317 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemma 3 12B: 47.7 (#205)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1334 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1331 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1126 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1334 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B better than Gemma 3 12B?
Gemma 3 12B has enough public results to be ranked (#255); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B or Gemma 3 12B better for coding?
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 6.7B and Gemma 3 12B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 12B has 24.