Model comparison

DeepSeek Coder 33B vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#44); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek Coder 33B DeepSeek

38.3

Unranked Sparse

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

49.8

Rank #44 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.2 in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 48.6 to 37.4.
  • DeepSeek Coder 33B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek Coder 33B and Muse Spark 1.2 specifications
DeepSeek Coder 33BMuse Spark 1.2
ProviderDeepSeekMeta
Noometry Index38.349.8
Released2023-11-022026-08-05
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked928

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

DeepSeek Coder 33B: 37.4 (#180), Muse Spark 1.2: 48.6 (#49)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BMuse Spark 1.2
DeepSWE—54.9%
LMArena WebDev—1532
FrontierSWE—12%
SciCode—56.4%
WeirdML—60.3%
BigCodeBench Instruct42%—
LMArena Coding—1497
BigCodeBench Complete51.1%—
HumanEval+75%—
MBPP+70.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 29.5 (#77)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BMuse Spark 1.2
APEX-Agents—36.4%
GDP.pdf—16%

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 50.4 (#32)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BMuse Spark 1.2
Epoch Capabilities Index95.74155.18
SimpleBench—74.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—79.2%
CritPt—17.7%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1490
DTBench—94.7%
LMCA—48.4%
WinoGrande62%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 43.8 (#68)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BMuse Spark 1.2
ProofBench—43%
GSM8K35.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 53.9 (#49)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BMuse Spark 1.2
SimpleQA Verified—60.3%
LMArena Expert—1485
ARC (AI2) Challenge42.2%—
MMLU39.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 42.6 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision—1304

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 57.4 (#10)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Non-English—1479
LMArena Chinese—1519
LMArena Russian—1494

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 77.1 (#30)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Instruction Following—1466

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 45.4 (#35)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Longer Query—1483

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 72.6 (#14)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text—1486
LMArena Creative Writing—1444
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1840
LMArena Multi-Turn—1504

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek Coder 33B better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#44); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek Coder 33B or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 33B and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper