Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 33B vs Muse Spark 1.1
Muse Spark 1.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#51); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.1 in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 51.3 to 38.0.
- DeepSeek Coder 33B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 33B | Muse Spark 1.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 38.9 | 49.9 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | 2026-04-08 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4.25 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 37 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads
DeepSeek Coder 33B: 38.0 (#184), Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 53.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1542 |
| SciCode | — | 58.8% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1498 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 51.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 75% | — |
| MBPP+ | 70.1% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 31.8% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 40.5% |
| GBAEval | — | 7.9% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 15% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 6,520 |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 96.32 | 154.21 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 84.9% |
| CritPt | — | 15.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1486 |
| DTBench | — | 94.4% |
| LMCA | — | 49.9% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 52.5% |
| WinoGrande | 62% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 39% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1483 |
| GSM8K | 35.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 57.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1478 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.2% | — |
| MMLU | 39.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1293 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1465 |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1472 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1518 |
| LMArena French | — | 1494 |
| LMArena German | — | 1466 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1451 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1458 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1483 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1464 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1457 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1462 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1479 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1437 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1927 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1260 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1485 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 33B better than Muse Spark 1.1?
Muse Spark 1.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#51); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 33B or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?
Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.3 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 33B and Muse Spark 1.1 share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 37.