Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 33B vs MiniMax M1
MiniMax M1 has enough public results to be ranked (#146); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
MiniMaxSide by side
| DeepSeek Coder 33B | MiniMax M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 38.3 | 39.7 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | 2025-06-13 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 40K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.20 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax M1 leads
DeepSeek Coder 33B: 37.4 (#180), MiniMax M1: 39.2 (#149)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1359 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 51.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 75% | — |
| MBPP+ | 70.1% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, MiniMax M1: 25.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1340 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 95.74 | — |
| WinoGrande | 62% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, MiniMax M1: 34.8 (#152)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1360 |
| GSM8K | 35.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, MiniMax M1: 35.7 (#168)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1316 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.2% | — |
| MMLU | 39.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, MiniMax M1: 46.0 (#157)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1320 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1361 |
| LMArena French | — | 1369 |
| LMArena German | — | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1220 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1330 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1354 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, MiniMax M1: 69.5 (#169)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1312 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#136)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 69.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1326 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, MiniMax M1: 53.3 (#155)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1343 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1298 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1335 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 33B better than MiniMax M1?
MiniMax M1 has enough public results to be ranked (#146); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 33B or MiniMax M1 better for coding?
MiniMax M1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.2 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 33B and MiniMax M1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.