Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 33B vs MiMo-V2-Flash
MiMo-V2-Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#137); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeekSide by side
| DeepSeek Coder 33B | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 38.3 | 40.8 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek Coder 33B leads
DeepSeek Coder 33B: 37.4 (#180), MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1443 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 51.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
| HumanEval+ | 75% | — |
| MBPP+ | 70.1% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.1 (#155)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1420 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 95.74 | — |
| WinoGrande | 62% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.6 (#141)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1396 |
| GSM8K | 35.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.1 (#126)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1425 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.2% | — |
| MMLU | 39.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.1 (#109)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1391 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1463 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1324 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1392 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#106)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1409 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.9 (#101)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1404 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 33B better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#137); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 33B or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 33B and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.