Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 33B vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has enough public results to be ranked (#139); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
TencentSummary
- DeepSeek Coder 33B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 33B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 38.9 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
DeepSeek Coder 33B: 38.0 (#184), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1361 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 51.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 75% | — |
| MBPP+ | 70.1% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1374 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 96.32 | — |
| WinoGrande | 62% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1359 |
| GSM8K | 35.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1339 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.2% | — |
| MMLU | 39.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1363 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1417 |
| LMArena French | — | 1391 |
| LMArena German | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1342 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1368 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1344 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1366 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1359 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1387 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 33B better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has enough public results to be ranked (#139); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 33B or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 33B and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.