Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 33B vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#199); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
NVIDIASummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher in 1 category and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 33B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 38.3 | 37.0 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | 2024-12-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek Coder 33B leads
DeepSeek Coder 33B: 37.4 (#180), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.3 (#212)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42% | 38.7% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 51.1% | 48.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1272 |
| HumanEval+ | 75% | — |
| MBPP+ | 70.1% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 24.0 (#156)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1266 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 95.74 | — |
| WinoGrande | 62% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 32.9 (#182)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1271 |
| GSM8K | 35.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 33.5 (#194)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1242 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.2% | — |
| MMLU | 39.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 40.7 (#212)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1245 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1227 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 66.2 (#208)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1252 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 37.5 (#210)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1239 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 48.6 (#197)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1275 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 33B better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#199); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 33B or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct better for coding?
DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 35.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 33B and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has 14.