Noometry

Model comparison

DeepSeek Coder 33B vs GPT-4.5

GPT-4.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#208); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek Coder 33B DeepSeek

38.9

Unranked Sparse

GPT-4.5 OpenAI

37.2

Rank #208 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-4.5 in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-4.5 leads 42.2 to 38.0.
  • DeepSeek Coder 33B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek Coder 33BGPT-4.5
ProviderDeepSeekOpenAI
Noometry Index38.937.2
Released2023-11-022025-02-27
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked942

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-4.5 leads

DeepSeek Coder 33B: 38.0 (#184), GPT-4.5: 42.2 (#109)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGPT-4.5
Aider Polyglot—44.9%
WeirdML—39.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct42%—
LiveBench Coding—75.2%
LMArena Coding—1396
BigCodeBench Complete51.1%—
HumanEval+75%—
MBPP+70.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, GPT-4.5: 27.9 (#97)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGPT-4.5
Cybench—17.5%

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, GPT-4.5: 13.9 (#330)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGPT-4.5
Epoch Capabilities Index96.32136.74
ARC-AGI-2—0.8%
SimpleBench—34.5%
ARC-AGI-1—10.3%
EnigmaEval—3.2%
LiveBench Reasoning—71.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1403
LiveBench Data Analysis—64.3%
ForecastBench—61.7
LiveBench—69%
WinoGrande62%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, GPT-4.5: 32.6 (#211)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGPT-4.5
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—37.8%
LiveBench Math—69.3%
LMArena Math—1412
MATH Level 5—78.6%
GSM8K35.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, GPT-4.5: 32.5 (#211)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGPT-4.5
GPQA Diamond—68.7%
Humanity's Last Exam—5.4%
Confabulations—13.6%
LMArena Expert—1394
ARC (AI2) Challenge42.2%—
MMLU39.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, GPT-4.5: 37.6 (#71)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGPT-4.5
LMArena Vision—1195
VPCT—45%

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, GPT-4.5: 52.5 (#83)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGPT-4.5
LMArena Non-English—1413
LMArena Chinese—1421
LMArena French—1418
LMArena German—1457
LMArena Japanese—1416
LMArena Korean—1392
LMArena Russian—1419

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, GPT-4.5: 72.6 (#134)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGPT-4.5
LiveBench Instruction Following—72.3%
LMArena Instruction Following—1404

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#155)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGPT-4.5
Fiction.LiveBench—63.9%
LMArena Longer Query—1406

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, GPT-4.5: 56.9 (#134)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGPT-4.5
LMArena Text—1417
LMArena Creative Writing—1394
Short-Story Creative Writing—75.6%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1258
LMArena Multi-Turn—1444
LiveBench Language—61.5%

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek Coder 33B better than GPT-4.5?

GPT-4.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#208); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek Coder 33B or GPT-4.5 better for coding?

GPT-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 33B and GPT-4.5 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.5 has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper