Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 33B vs Gemma 1.1 2b IT
Gemma 1.1 2b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#313); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
GoogleSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher in 1 category and Gemma 1.1 2b IT in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek Coder 33B leads 38.0 to 30.1.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | |
| Noometry Index | 38.9 | 29.3 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek Coder 33B leads
DeepSeek Coder 33B: 38.0 (#184), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| HumanEval+ | 75% | 17.7% |
| MBPP+ | 70.1% | 23.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1034 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 51.1% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1005 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 96.32 | — |
| WinoGrande | 62% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1047 |
| GSM8K | 35.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 970 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.2% | — |
| MMLU | 39.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 988 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1012 |
| LMArena German | — | 944 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 899 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 990 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 992 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1003 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1022 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 998 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 959 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 33B better than Gemma 1.1 2b IT?
Gemma 1.1 2b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#313); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 33B or Gemma 1.1 2b IT better for coding?
DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 33B and Gemma 1.1 2b IT share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16.