Model comparison
DBRX vs DeepSeek Coder 33B
DBRX has enough public results to be ranked (#311); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
DeepSeekSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and DeepSeek Coder 33B in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek Coder 33B leads 38.0 to 32.9.
Side by side
| DBRX | DeepSeek Coder 33B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | DeepSeek |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 38.9 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | 2023-11-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek Coder 33B leads
DBRX: 32.9 (#266), DeepSeek Coder 33B: 38.0 (#184)
| Benchmark | DBRX | DeepSeek Coder 33B |
|---|---|---|
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | 75% |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | 70.1% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 42% |
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 51.1% |
Reasoning Not comparable
DBRX: 21.4 (#222), DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | DeepSeek Coder 33B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 96.32 |
| WinoGrande | — | 62% |
Math Not comparable
DBRX: 24.3 (#269), DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | DeepSeek Coder 33B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 35.4% |
Knowledge Not comparable
DBRX: 14.9 (#294), DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | DeepSeek Coder 33B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 42.2% |
| MMLU | — | 39.4% |
Multilingual Not comparable
DBRX: 29.3 (#268), DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | DeepSeek Coder 33B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | — |
| LMArena French | 1096 | — |
| LMArena German | 1057 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DBRX: 57.5 (#270), DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | DeepSeek Coder 33B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
DBRX: 33.7 (#258), DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | DeepSeek Coder 33B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DBRX: 33.6 (#275), DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | DeepSeek Coder 33B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than DeepSeek Coder 33B?
DBRX has enough public results to be ranked (#311); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DBRX or DeepSeek Coder 33B better for coding?
DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and DeepSeek Coder 33B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9.