Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#305); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B scores higher in 1 category and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 29.6% for DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and 40.6% for Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 35.0 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek Coder 1.3B leads
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 31.2 (#287), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 22.8% | 29.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 29.6% | 40.6% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1039 |
| HumanEval+ | 60.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 54.8% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1028 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 63.6 | — |
| WinoGrande | 53.3% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1089 |
| GSM8K | 4.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 984 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 25.4% | — |
| MMLU | 25.8% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1016 |
| LMArena French | — | 1039 |
| LMArena German | — | 1006 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 899 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 856 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1004 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1059 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1023 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 996 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1050 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 989 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#305); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.2 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.