Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
OLMo 2 Furious 13B has enough public results to be ranked (#301); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 34.5 | 29.2 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek Coder 1.3B leads
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 30.7 (#282), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 22.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 29.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 60.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 54.8% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 62.18 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
| WinoGrande | 53.3% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| GSM8K | 4.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 25.4% | — |
| MMLU | 25.8% | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
OLMo 2 Furious 13B has enough public results to be ranked (#301); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.7 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.