Model comparison

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs Grok-2 (Dec 2024)

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has enough public results to be ranked (#233); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B DeepSeek

34.5

Unranked Sparse

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.4

Rank #233 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) specifications
DeepSeek Coder 1.3BGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
ProviderDeepSeekxAI
Noometry Index34.533.4
Released2023-11-022024-08-13
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked934

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 30.7 (#282), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 32.9 (#254)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
WeirdML—22.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct22.8%—
LiveBench Coding—46.4%
LMArena Coding—1288
BigCodeBench Complete29.6%—
HumanEval+60.4%—
MBPP+54.8%—

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.4 (#294)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
Epoch Capabilities Index62.18130.48
SimpleBench—22.7%
LiveBench Reasoning—54.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1272
DTBench—65.2%
LiveBench Data Analysis—54.5%
LiveBench—54.3%
WinoGrande53.3%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 19.6 (#278)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—11.5%
LiveBench Math—54.9%
LMArena Math—1283
MATH Level 5—63.5%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0.7%
GSM8K4.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#225)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
GPQA Diamond—53.8%
Confabulations—20.1%
LMArena Expert—1254
ARC (AI2) Challenge25.4%—
MMLU25.8%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.3 (#183)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Non-English—1282
LMArena Chinese—1289
LMArena French—1317
LMArena German—1287
LMArena Japanese—1244
LMArena Korean—1237
LMArena Russian—1286
LMArena Spanish—1281

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 67.1 (#197)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LiveBench Instruction Following—69.6%
LMArena Instruction Following—1270

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.7 (#186)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Longer Query—1276

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.8 (#192)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Text—1305
LMArena Creative Writing—1284
Short-Story Creative Writing—63.6%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1290
LiveBench Language—45.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than Grok-2 (Dec 2024)?

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has enough public results to be ranked (#233); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B or Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better for coding?

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper