Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs Gemma 1.1 7b IT
Gemma 1.1 7b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#275); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
GoogleSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B scores higher in 0 categories and Gemma 1.1 7b IT in 1 category, but none of those gaps is larger than the uncertainty.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | |
| Noometry Index | 34.5 | 30.7 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 30.7 (#282), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.0 (#279)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| HumanEval+ | 60.4% | 35.4% |
| MBPP+ | 54.8% | 45% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 22.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1084 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 29.6% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 19.6 (#235)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1071 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 62.18 | — |
| WinoGrande | 53.3% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 29.5 (#217)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1107 |
| GSM8K | 4.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 27.8 (#242)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1039 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 25.4% | — |
| MMLU | 25.8% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#268)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1052 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1060 |
| LMArena French | — | 1064 |
| LMArena German | — | 1054 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 971 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 988 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1046 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1049 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.3 (#278)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1057 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#267)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1056 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.6 (#283)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1094 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1059 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1040 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than Gemma 1.1 7b IT?
Gemma 1.1 7b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#275); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B or Gemma 1.1 7b IT better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (30.7 vs 31.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Gemma 1.1 7b IT share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19.