Model comparison
DBRX vs QwQ-32B
QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and QwQ-32B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where QwQ-32B leads 37.2 to 14.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 32.9% for DBRX and 65.3% for QwQ-32B.
Side by side
| DBRX | QwQ-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 39.8 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | 2024-11-28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding QwQ-32B leads
DBRX: 32.9 (#266), QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226)
| Benchmark | DBRX | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1333 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Reasoning QwQ-32B leads
DBRX: 21.4 (#222), QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174)
| Benchmark | DBRX | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1325 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 137.6 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |
Math QwQ-32B leads
DBRX: 24.3 (#269), QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143)
| Benchmark | DBRX | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1359 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 59.2% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge QwQ-32B leads
DBRX: 14.9 (#294), QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158)
| Benchmark | DBRX | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | 65.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1324 |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |
Multilingual QwQ-32B leads
DBRX: 29.3 (#268), QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176)
| Benchmark | DBRX | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1305 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1378 |
| LMArena French | 1096 | 1336 |
| LMArena German | 1057 | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | 1279 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | 1354 |
Instruction Following QwQ-32B leads
DBRX: 57.5 (#270), QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137)
| Benchmark | DBRX | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |
Long Context QwQ-32B leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#258), QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)
| Benchmark | DBRX | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1308 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
Writing & Preference QwQ-32B leads
DBRX: 33.6 (#275), QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180)
| Benchmark | DBRX | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1257 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than QwQ-32B?
QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is DBRX or QwQ-32B better for coding?
QwQ-32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.4 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and QwQ-32B share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.