Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Hunyuan T1 20250711

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.5

Rank #310 Confirmed

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

42.5

Rank #114 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 38.7 to 14.8.

Side by side

Claude 3 OpusHunyuan T1 20250711
ProviderAnthropicTencent
Noometry Index29.542.5
Released2024-02-29—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4613

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Coding12641390
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusHunyuan T1 20250711
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Hard Prompts12451399
SimpleBench23.5%—
Chess Puzzles5%—
EnigmaEval0.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
DTBench61.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA17%—
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91—
ForecastBench58.4—
LiveBench49.2%—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Math12731414
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%—
LiveBench Math43.6%—
MATH Level 537.5%—

Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Expert12231395
GPQA Diamond47.2%—
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
Confabulations22.7%—
MMLU84.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Vision1023—

Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Non-English12581395
LMArena Chinese12481425
LMArena Korean11871406
LMArena Russian12801385
LMArena French1275—
LMArena German1258—
LMArena Japanese1204—
LMArena Spanish1246—

Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Instruction Following12481374
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—

Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Longer Query12591384

Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Text12621401
LMArena Creative Writing12351392
LMArena Multi-Turn12751393
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Opus or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper