Model comparison
Command R vs Yi-Large
Command R has enough public results to be ranked (#272); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
CohereSummary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Yi-Large in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Yi-Large leads 36.7 to 29.3.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command R | Yi-Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Yi-Large leads
Command R: 29.3 (#306), Yi-Large: 36.7 (#203)
| Benchmark | Command R | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | 37.7% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | 47.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Command R: 13.8 (#331), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
Math Not comparable
Command R: 28.0 (#246), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command R: 31.0 (#221), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 65.2% | 79.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command R: 35.7 (#245), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command R: 58.1 (#261), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R: 36.3 (#231), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Command R: 38.2 (#254), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Yi-Large?
Command R has enough public results to be ranked (#272); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Command R or Yi-Large better for coding?
Yi-Large scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.7 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Yi-Large share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Large has 3.