Model comparison
Command R vs Yi-34B
Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
CohereSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 6 categories and Yi-34B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command R leads 30.5 to 7.5.
Side by side
| Command R | Yi-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 27.4 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2023-11-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Yi-34B leads
Command R: 28.8 (#301), Yi-34B: 31.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | Command R | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | 1112 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Yi-34B leads
Command R: 13.3 (#329), Yi-34B: 20.3 (#222)
| Benchmark | Command R | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1104 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 71.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 117.28 |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
Math Command R leads
Command R: 25.8 (#244), Yi-34B: 19.8 (#277)
| Benchmark | Command R | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1114 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 5.1% |
| GSM8K | — | 76% |
Knowledge Command R leads
Command R: 30.5 (#219), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#304)
| Benchmark | Command R | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1061 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | 76.3% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 14.7% |
Multilingual Command R leads
Command R: 35.9 (#240), Yi-34B: 29.9 (#259)
| Benchmark | Command R | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1079 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1175 |
| LMArena French | 1161 | 1080 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1042 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 993 |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | 959 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1050 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | 1070 |
Instruction Following Command R leads
Command R: 58.3 (#256), Yi-34B: 56.4 (#269)
| Benchmark | Command R | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1091 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
Long Context Command R leads
Command R: 36.3 (#226), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#259)
| Benchmark | Command R | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1094 |
Writing & Preference Command R leads
Command R: 38.4 (#248), Yi-34B: 34.3 (#268)
| Benchmark | Command R | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1129 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1108 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1113 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Yi-34B?
Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R or Yi-34B better for coding?
Yi-34B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.8 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Yi-34B share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.