Model comparison
Command R vs Yi-1.5-34B
Command R and Yi-1.5-34B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.4 vs 30.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
CohereSummary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 5 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command R leads 31.0 to 14.8.
Side by side
| Command R | Yi-1.5-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 30.6 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Yi-1.5-34B leads
Command R: 29.3 (#306), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)
| Benchmark | Command R | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | 33.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1169 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | 43.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
Reasoning Yi-1.5-34B leads
Command R: 13.8 (#331), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)
| Benchmark | Command R | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1160 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
Math Too close to call
Command R: 28.0 (#246), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)
| Benchmark | Command R | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1182 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 25.5% |
Knowledge Command R leads
Command R: 31.0 (#221), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)
| Benchmark | Command R | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1144 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 32% |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |
Multilingual Command R leads
Command R: 35.7 (#245), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | Command R | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1213 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | 1156 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1111 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 1021 |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | 1005 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1091 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | 1121 |
Instruction Following Yi-1.5-34B leads
Command R: 58.1 (#261), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)
| Benchmark | Command R | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1139 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
Long Context Command R leads
Command R: 36.3 (#231), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)
| Benchmark | Command R | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1143 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Command R: 38.2 (#254), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)
| Benchmark | Command R | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1173 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1135 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1153 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Yi-1.5-34B?
Command R and Yi-1.5-34B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.4 vs 30.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Command R or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?
Yi-1.5-34B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.4 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Yi-1.5-34B share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.