Model comparison
Command R vs Step 1o Turbo 202506
Step 1o Turbo 202506 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
StepFunSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Step 1o Turbo 202506 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads 53.1 to 38.2.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command R | Step 1o Turbo 202506 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 39.7 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Command R: 29.3 (#306), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 39.2 (#160)
| Benchmark | Command R | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1339 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Command R: 13.8 (#331), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 26.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Command R | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1335 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
Math Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Command R: 28.0 (#246), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.6 (#164)
| Benchmark | Command R | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1318 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
Knowledge Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Command R: 31.0 (#221), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.1 (#176)
| Benchmark | Command R | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1308 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Command R: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.1 (#80)
| Benchmark | Command R | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1186 |
Multilingual Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Command R: 35.7 (#245), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 45.3 (#173)
| Benchmark | Command R | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1380 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1327 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |
Instruction Following Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Command R: 58.1 (#261), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 69.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | Command R | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1310 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
Long Context Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Command R: 36.3 (#231), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 41.0 (#146)
| Benchmark | Command R | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1348 |
Writing & Preference Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Command R: 38.2 (#254), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 53.1 (#160)
| Benchmark | Command R | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1336 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1307 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1340 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Step 1o Turbo 202506?
Step 1o Turbo 202506 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R or Step 1o Turbo 202506 better for coding?
Step 1o Turbo 202506 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.2 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Step 1o Turbo 202506 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Step 1o Turbo 202506 has 14.