Model comparison
Command R vs Phi-2
Command R has enough public results to be ranked (#267); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
Side by side
| Command R | Phi-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | — |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2023-12-12 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Command R: 28.8 (#301), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 45.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 54.2% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Command R: 13.3 (#329), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 42.5% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 59.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 107.62 |
| HellaSwag | — | 53.6% |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
| WinoGrande | — | 54.7% |
Math Not comparable
Command R: 25.8 (#244), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command R: 30.5 (#219), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 65.2% | 58.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 75.9% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 73.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 45.2% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command R: 35.9 (#240), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1161 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command R: 58.3 (#256), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R: 36.3 (#226), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Command R: 38.4 (#248), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Phi-2?
Command R has enough public results to be ranked (#267); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Phi-2 share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Phi-2 has 11.