Model comparison
Command R vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 3 categories and OLMo 2 Furious 13B in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command R leads 31.0 to 18.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Data Analysis: 33.3% for Command R and 20.6% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B.
Side by side
| Command R | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Command R: 29.3 (#306), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Command R | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | 10.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Command R: 13.8 (#331), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Command R | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | 16.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | 22.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
Math Command R leads
Command R: 28.0 (#246), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Command R | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | 13.6% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |
Knowledge Command R leads
Command R: 31.0 (#221), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Command R | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command R: 35.7 (#245), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |
Instruction Following OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Command R: 58.1 (#261), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Command R | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R: 36.3 (#231), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |
Writing & Preference OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Command R: 38.2 (#254), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Command R | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | 11.2% |
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (29.3 vs 28.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Command R and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.