Model comparison

Command R vs Mistral Nemo

Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command R's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Command R Cohere

31.0

Rank #267 Confirmed

Mistral Nemo Mistral AI

25.9

Rank #332 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 3 categories and Mistral Nemo in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command R leads 30.5 to 12.3.
  • Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.60 for Command R.

Side by side

Command R and Mistral Nemo specifications
Command RMistral Nemo
ProviderCohereMistral AI
Noometry Index31.025.9
Released2024-08-302024-07-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K128K
Max output4K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.15$0.15
Output $ / M tokens$0.60$0.15
Results tracked2910

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Command R: 28.8 (#301), Mistral Nemo: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RMistral Nemo
BigCodeBench Instruct37.1%—
LiveBench Coding17.9%—
LMArena Coding1170—
BigCodeBench Complete45.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Command R: —, Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RMistral Nemo
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—27.6%
BALROG—17.6%

Reasoning Mistral Nemo leads

Command R: 13.3 (#329), Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RMistral Nemo
DTBench46.4%48.6%
LiveBench Reasoning21.9%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1164—
LiveBench Data Analysis33.3%—
LMCA9.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—118.63
LiveBench27.5%—
PIQA—83.5%

Math Command R leads

Command R: 25.8 (#244), Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RMistral Nemo
LiveBench Math19.4%—
LMArena Math1155—
MATH Level 5—10.8%
GSM8K—84.2%

Knowledge Command R leads

Command R: 30.5 (#219), Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RMistral Nemo
GPQA Diamond—29.9%
LMArena Expert1138—
BoolQ—82.5%
MMLU65.2%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Command R: 35.9 (#240), Mistral Nemo: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RMistral Nemo
LMArena Non-English1174—
LMArena Chinese1182—
LMArena French1161—
LMArena German1176—
LMArena Japanese1143—
LMArena Korean1162—
LMArena Russian1174—
LMArena Spanish1150—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Command R: 58.3 (#256), Mistral Nemo: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RMistral Nemo
LiveBench Instruction Following55.6%—
LMArena Instruction Following1167—

Long Context Not comparable

Command R: 36.3 (#226), Mistral Nemo: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RMistral Nemo
LMArena Longer Query1198—

Writing & Preference Command R leads

Command R: 38.4 (#248), Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RMistral Nemo
LMArena Text1187—
LMArena Creative Writing1170—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—881
LMArena Multi-Turn1163—
LiveBench Language16.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R better than Mistral Nemo?

Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command R's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Command R or Mistral Nemo?

Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Command R lists at $0.15 and $0.60.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 128K tokens.

How many benchmarks do Command R and Mistral Nemo share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper