Model comparison
Command R vs Ministral 3B
Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 25.6 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 6.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command R's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Mistral AISummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 2 categories and Ministral 3B in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command R leads 30.5 to 10.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 46.4% for Command R and 51.7% for Ministral 3B.
- Ministral 3B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.04 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.60 for Command R.
Side by side
| Command R | Ministral 3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 25.6 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2024-10-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 128K |
| Max output | 4K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $0.04 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | $0.04 |
| Results tracked | 29 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Command R: 28.8 (#301), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Ministral 3B leads
Command R: 13.3 (#329), Ministral 3B: 17.7 (#278)
| Benchmark | Command R | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 46.4% | 51.7% |
| LMCA | 9.2% | 5.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.08 |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
Math Command R leads
Command R: 25.8 (#244), Ministral 3B: 24.5 (#257)
| Benchmark | Command R | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 14.4% |
Knowledge Command R leads
Command R: 30.5 (#219), Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#297)
| Benchmark | Command R | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 25.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command R: 35.9 (#240), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1161 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command R: 58.3 (#256), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R: 36.3 (#226), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Command R: 38.4 (#248), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Ministral 3B?
Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 25.6 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 6.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command R's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Command R or Ministral 3B?
Ministral 3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.04 per million output tokens; Command R lists at $0.15 and $0.60.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 128K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Ministral 3B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 3B has 6.