Model comparison
Command R vs Llama 13b
Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
MetaSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 13b in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Command R leads 38.4 to 13.9.
Side by side
| Command R | Llama 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 23.9 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2023-02-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Command R leads
Command R: 28.8 (#301), Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | 683 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Command R: 13.3 (#329), Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 728 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 100.09 |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |
Math Command R leads
Command R: 25.8 (#244), Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 838 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command R: 30.5 (#219), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 65.2% | 47.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Command R: —, Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |
Multilingual Command R leads
Command R: 35.9 (#240), Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 819 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1161 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | — |
Instruction Following Command R leads
Command R: 58.3 (#256), Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 781 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R: 36.3 (#226), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |
Writing & Preference Command R leads
Command R: 38.4 (#248), Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 753 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Llama 13b?
Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R or Llama 13b better for coding?
Command R scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.8 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Llama 13b share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.