Model comparison

Command R vs Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Command R Cohere

31.4

Rank #272 Confirmed

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 xAI

37.7

Rank #198 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads 24.8 to 13.8.
  • Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command R and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 specifications
Command RGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
ProviderCoherexAI
Noometry Index31.437.7
Released2024-08-302024-08-13
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked2917

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads

Command R: 29.3 (#306), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 37.0 (#199)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
LMArena Coding11691269
BigCodeBench Instruct37.1%—
LiveBench Coding17.9%—
BigCodeBench Complete45.2%—

Reasoning Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads

Command R: 13.8 (#331), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 24.8 (#159)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
LMArena Hard Prompts11641255
LiveBench Reasoning21.9%—
DTBench46.4%—
LiveBench Data Analysis33.3%—
LMCA9.2%—
LiveBench27.5%—

Math Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads

Command R: 28.0 (#246), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 35.4 (#185)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
LMArena Math11551265
LiveBench Math19.4%—

Knowledge Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads

Command R: 31.0 (#221), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.9 (#200)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
LMArena Expert11381238
MMLU65.2%—

Multilingual Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads

Command R: 35.7 (#245), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.4 (#208)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
LMArena Non-English11741257
LMArena Chinese11821262
LMArena French11621286
LMArena German11761273
LMArena Japanese11431213
LMArena Korean11631195
LMArena Russian11741261
LMArena Spanish11511279

Instruction Following Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads

Command R: 58.1 (#261), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.5 (#220)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
LMArena Instruction Following11671245
LiveBench Instruction Following55.6%—

Long Context Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads

Command R: 36.3 (#231), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#196)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
LMArena Longer Query11981266

Writing & Preference Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads

Command R: 38.2 (#254), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.3 (#211)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
LMArena Text11871281
LMArena Creative Writing11701242
LMArena Multi-Turn11631265
LiveBench Language16.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R better than Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13?

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Command R or Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better for coding?

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Command R and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper