Model comparison

Command R vs Granite 4.1 8b

Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Command R Cohere

31.4

Rank #272 Confirmed

Granite 4.1 8b IBM

37.4

Rank #205 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 4.1 8b in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.1 8b leads 25.7 to 13.8.

Side by side

Command R and Granite 4.1 8b specifications
Command RGranite 4.1 8b
ProviderCohereIBM
Noometry Index31.437.4
Released2024-08-30—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked2913

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Command R: 29.3 (#306), Granite 4.1 8b: 30.1 (#297)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Coding11691312
LMArena WebDev—1192
BigCodeBench Instruct37.1%—
LiveBench Coding17.9%—
BigCodeBench Complete45.2%—

Reasoning Granite 4.1 8b leads

Command R: 13.8 (#331), Granite 4.1 8b: 25.7 (#143)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Hard Prompts11641293
LiveBench Reasoning21.9%—
DTBench46.4%—
LiveBench Data Analysis33.3%—
LMCA9.2%—
LiveBench27.5%—

Math Granite 4.1 8b leads

Command R: 28.0 (#246), Granite 4.1 8b: 36.4 (#166)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Math11551312
LiveBench Math19.4%—

Knowledge Granite 4.1 8b leads

Command R: 31.0 (#221), Granite 4.1 8b: 36.1 (#174)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Expert11381309
MMLU65.2%—

Multilingual Granite 4.1 8b leads

Command R: 35.7 (#245), Granite 4.1 8b: 41.7 (#204)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Non-English11741261
LMArena Chinese11821337
LMArena Russian11741240
LMArena French1162—
LMArena German1176—
LMArena Japanese1143—
LMArena Korean1163—
LMArena Spanish1151—

Instruction Following Granite 4.1 8b leads

Command R: 58.1 (#261), Granite 4.1 8b: 66.9 (#203)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Instruction Following11671269
LiveBench Instruction Following55.6%—

Long Context Granite 4.1 8b leads

Command R: 36.3 (#231), Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#193)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Longer Query11981275

Writing & Preference Granite 4.1 8b leads

Command R: 38.2 (#254), Granite 4.1 8b: 48.1 (#204)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Text11871290
LMArena Creative Writing11701251
LMArena Multi-Turn11631268
LiveBench Language16.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R better than Granite 4.1 8b?

Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Command R or Granite 4.1 8b better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (29.3 vs 30.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Command R and Granite 4.1 8b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.1 8b has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper