Model comparison
Command R vs Falcon-7B
Command R has enough public results to be ranked (#272); Falcon-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
Side by side
| Command R | Falcon-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Technology Innovation Institute |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | — |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2023-04-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Command R: 29.3 (#306), Falcon-7B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Falcon-7B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Command R: 13.8 (#331), Falcon-7B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Falcon-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 28.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 95.1 |
| HellaSwag | — | 78.1% |
| LAMBADA | — | 74.9% |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
| PIQA | — | 80.3% |
| WinoGrande | — | 67.2% |
Math Not comparable
Command R: 28.0 (#246), Falcon-7B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Falcon-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 6.8% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command R: 31.0 (#221), Falcon-7B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Falcon-7B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 65.2% | 35% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 47.9% |
| BoolQ | — | 75.3% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 51.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 64.6% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command R: 35.7 (#245), Falcon-7B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Falcon-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command R: 58.1 (#261), Falcon-7B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Falcon-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R: 36.3 (#231), Falcon-7B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Falcon-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Command R: 38.2 (#254), Falcon-7B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Falcon-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Falcon-7B?
Command R has enough public results to be ranked (#272); Falcon-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Falcon-7B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Falcon-7B has 12.