Model comparison
Command R vs Dolly 2.0-12b
Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
DatabricksSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 5 categories and Dolly 2.0-12b in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Command R leads 38.2 to 15.2.
Side by side
| Command R | Dolly 2.0-12b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Databricks |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 25.5 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2023-04-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Command R leads
Command R: 29.3 (#306), Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332)
| Benchmark | Command R | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 776 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Dolly 2.0-12b leads
Command R: 13.8 (#331), Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316)
| Benchmark | Command R | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 804 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 89.67 |
| HellaSwag | — | 70.8% |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
| PIQA | — | 75.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 61.8% |
Math Too close to call
Command R: 28.0 (#246), Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251)
| Benchmark | Command R | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 871 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command R: 31.0 (#221), Dolly 2.0-12b: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 65.2% | 26.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 39.6% |
| BoolQ | — | 56.3% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 39.2% |
Multilingual Command R leads
Command R: 35.7 (#245), Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296)
| Benchmark | Command R | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 836 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 836 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |
Instruction Following Command R leads
Command R: 58.1 (#261), Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304)
| Benchmark | Command R | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 814 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R: 36.3 (#231), Dolly 2.0-12b: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |
Writing & Preference Command R leads
Command R: 38.2 (#254), Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311)
| Benchmark | Command R | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 851 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 864 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 740 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Dolly 2.0-12b?
Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R or Dolly 2.0-12b better for coding?
Command R scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.3 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Dolly 2.0-12b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Dolly 2.0-12b has 17.