Model comparison
Command R+ vs Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
NVIDIASummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 leads 26.8 to 9.2.
- Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 is cheaper at $0.40 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
- Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| Command R+ | Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 40.3 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2025-07-25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 131K |
| Max output | 4K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $0.40 |
| Results tracked | 34 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 leads
Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 39.8 (#154)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1355 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 leads
Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 26.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1336 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
Math Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 leads
Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 38.2 (#141)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1392 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 36.7 (#165)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1330 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |
Multilingual Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 leads
Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 45.5 (#168)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1316 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | 1300 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1332 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | — |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |
Instruction Following Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 leads
Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 68.6 (#188)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1299 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
Long Context Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 leads
Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 40.0 (#164)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1315 |
Writing & Preference Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 leads
Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 53.1 (#159)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1338 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1307 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1334 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5?
Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Command R+ or Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5?
Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.
Is Command R+ or Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 better for coding?
Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.8 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 does, with 131K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 has 12.