Model comparison

Command R+ vs MiniMax M1

MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.4

Rank #257 Confirmed

MiniMax M1 MiniMax

40.3

Rank #150 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 1 category and MiniMax M1 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiniMax M1 leads 26.9 to 9.2.
  • MiniMax M1 is cheaper at $0.55 / $2.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
  • MiniMax M1 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Command R+ and MiniMax M1 specifications
Command R+MiniMax M1
ProviderCohereMiniMax
Noometry Index32.440.3
Released2024-08-302025-06-13
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K1M
Max output4K40K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.55
Output $ / M tokens$10$2.20
Results tracked3418

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax M1 leads

Command R+: 29.1 (#309), MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+MiniMax M1
LMArena Coding11871359
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Reasoning MiniMax M1 leads

Command R+: 9.2 (#344), MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+MiniMax M1
LMArena Hard Prompts11861339
SimpleBench17.4%—
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.34—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math MiniMax M1 leads

Command R+: 28.9 (#242), MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+MiniMax M1
LMArena Math11881361
LiveBench Math21.3%—

Knowledge Too close to call

Command R+: 36.4 (#169), MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+MiniMax M1
LMArena Expert11741317
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%—
MMLU69.4%—

Multilingual MiniMax M1 leads

Command R+: 38.6 (#227), MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+MiniMax M1
LMArena Non-English12161319
LMArena Chinese12261360
LMArena French12091370
LMArena German12161350
LMArena Japanese11661217
LMArena Korean11381266
LMArena Russian12271329
LMArena Spanish11891353

Instruction Following MiniMax M1 leads

Command R+: 60.0 (#254), MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+MiniMax M1
LMArena Instruction Following11971312
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—

Long Context MiniMax M1 leads

Command R+: 37.3 (#219), MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+MiniMax M1
LMArena Longer Query12301326
Fiction.LiveBench—69.4%

Writing & Preference MiniMax M1 leads

Command R+: 43.5 (#228), MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+MiniMax M1
LMArena Text12291343
LMArena Creative Writing12351298
LMArena Multi-Turn12131335
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than MiniMax M1?

MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command R+ or MiniMax M1?

MiniMax M1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.55 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command R+ or MiniMax M1 better for coding?

MiniMax M1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax M1 does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and MiniMax M1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper