Model comparison

Command R+ vs Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.4

Rank #257 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #51 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 47.1 to 9.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is LMCA: 5% for Command R+ and 49.9% for Muse Spark 1.1.
  • Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper at $1.25 / $4.25 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
  • Muse Spark 1.1 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
  • Command R+ has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command R+ and Muse Spark 1.1 specifications
Command R+Muse Spark 1.1
ProviderCohereMeta
Noometry Index32.449.9
Released2024-08-302026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K1.05M
Max output4K131K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$1.25
Output $ / M tokens$10$4.25
Results tracked3437

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Coding11871498
DeepSWE—53.3%
LMArena WebDev—1542
SciCode—58.8%
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Command R+: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Muse Spark 1.1
APEX-Agents—31.8%
τ²-bench Banking—40.5%
GBAEval—7.9%
GDP.pdf—15%
Vending-Bench 2—6,520

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Hard Prompts11861486
DTBench54.9%94.4%
LMCA5%49.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index119.34154.21
SimpleBench17.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)—84.9%
CritPt—15.1%
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
Surface Evolver Bench—52.5%
LiveBench31.8%—

Math Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Math11881483
ProofBench—39%
LiveBench Math21.3%—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Expert11741478
SimpleQA Verified—57.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%—
MMLU69.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Command R+: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision—1293
LMArena Document—1465

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Non-English12161472
LMArena Chinese12261518
LMArena French12091494
LMArena German12161466
LMArena Japanese11661451
LMArena Korean11381458
LMArena Russian12271483
LMArena Spanish11891464

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Instruction Following11971457
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—

Long Context Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Longer Query12301462

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text12291479
LMArena Creative Writing12351437
LMArena Multi-Turn12131485
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1927
EQ-Bench 4—1260
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command R+ or Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command R+ or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.3 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.1 does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Muse Spark 1.1 share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper